A village remains, Redkovka, Ukraine. And handful of families refused to leave, for this is their home, the church its center:
Most of Redkovka’s residents — about 1,000 people — resettled after the disaster. But the five families there today, including Ms. Masanovitz and her husband, Mikhail, 73, refused.
“This was home for them,” Ms. Markosian said. “This was where they grew up.”
“It was something that I had to understand,” she said. “And that came from just being there and seeing the thread that weaves this entire village together.”
The thread, she found, was love: love for one another and love for the place. Together, the villagers endured the Second World War, Chernobyl and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Now, they rarely leave. Although a bus drives through, Ms. Markosian never saw anyone board.
Fukushima is worse than Chernobyl. Radioactivity concentrates in food. We’ve got to get over our hubris; our arrogance threatens our way of life. Video lasts 10 minutes.
Wikipedia entry on Caldicott, Australian anti-nuclear activist.
Saturday, 30 April, 4 – 8 PM, Judson Memorial Church Assembly Hall, 55 Washington Square South, New York City.
The teach-in will feature 3 speakers: Chris Williams of Pace University and author of”Ecology & Socialism”, Tim Judson President of the Citizens’ Awareness Network and Marilyn Elie-Co-founder of the Westchester Citizens’ Awareness Network. The speakers will go into the specifics of the Indian Point Nuclear Plant, it’s power production and N.Y’s useage, the Fukushima disaster and it’s potential parallels at Indian Point, and a broader context of the political and economic use of nuclear power. We will discuss strategy to shut it down.
Organized by Shut Down Indian Point Now!
Literary critic and philosopher Tim Morris has a very smart post for the philosophically minded: Fighting Modernity with Modernity? No Thanks. What he’s against:
According to one view, humans emancipate themselves from Nature into a more total freedom over its pure plasticity. Yet this would be to continue in the aesthetic-sadistic thought that Nature is a malleable cartoon character who can be stretched and shaped to our whim. And which sadist gets to decide what to do next?
That is to say, modernity has bequeathed us the view that we have the technological tools to push Nature everywhich way we please. So, for example, we can create all the nuclear power we need, and some day we’ll figure out what to do with all that nuclear waste sitting in pools and casks, and some day we’ll figure out how to build plants that aren’t vulnerable to earthquakes and tsunamis. Someday.
The question is, now that we know what we know, do we want to continue imagining different kinds of malleability (capitalism, communism) and is that all we want to do? Note that on my view, even if we achieve some kind of physical enactment of our dream—say we have enough political power and enough Earth shaking equipment—we will still be dreaming.
That is, now that we know we’re fouling our own nest with fracking and nuking and deep-sea drilling and all the rest, now that we know that, can we admit that we don’t really know what to do about all those unintended side-effects that keep getting in our face? Can we admit that we are limited, finite beings, and that we should conserve what we’ve got, both for us, and for the other creatures on that share this planet with us?
Do we keep on using tools from modernity’s toolkit to fix a problem created by that toolkit? Or do we see that the toolkit is a rather confusing part of a much wider configuration space?
Maybe we need a new tool kit? One that isn’t so new-fangled modern. One that is both old and newer than new. Let’s look at the truth, conserve what we got, and dance our way into a more sustainable future.
From Charlie’s Facebook page.
Hymn of Gratitude for the Catholic Worker Vol. LXXVII, No. 5 August-September, 2010 price 1 cent (can't find the sign for 'cent' very easily on this computer, sign of the times) these front page headlines: Joseph Takami of Nagasaki Our Lady the Hibakusha plus an excellent review of BOMBING CIVILIANS: A TWENTIETH CENTURY HISTORY. Edited by Yuki Tanaka and Marilyn B. Young. The New Press, New York and London, 2009. Reviewed by Bill Griffin. who titles his review Bombs Do Not Save Lives Here it is 2011 and May 1 coming up Truth & Traditions Party mobilizing people 1 x 1 to bring some sanity each day into politics USA a tar pit full of failing flailing dinosaurs desperate on the very brink of extinction us modest milky warmblooded mammals nipping at their gigantic achilles heels I know the blog box is not set up in a way that favors poets who may be fussy about space, wanting air and the aura of ether around the penumbra of each word, each line, and especially around each unspoken thot. Plodding traditional prose will have to serve.